From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20090831102028.GC14397@nibiru.local> References: <20090831102028.GC14397@nibiru.local> Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:59:18 +0200 Message-ID: From: hiro <23hiro@googlemail.com> To: weigelt@metux.de, Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [9fans] 9P/Styx: streaming / contigious reading Topicbox-Message-UUID: 5c7abfb8-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 Why don't you use a protocol more suitable for high latencies? On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Enrico Weigelt wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > did anyone already investigate how an streaming (w/o expicit read > requests) could be done via 9P ? > > An option could be adding a new opcode telling the server that it > should send RRead's contigiously, within some given some range. > (will require an ordered transport, since RRead lacks an position > field, but quite trivial to implement). > > What do you think about this ? > > > cu > -- > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > =C2=A0Enrico Weigelt, metux IT service -- http://www.metux.de/ > > =C2=A0phone: =C2=A0+49 36207 519931 =C2=A0email: weigelt@metux.de > =C2=A0mobile: +49 174 7066481 =C2=A0 icq: =C2=A0 210169427 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 skype: nekrad666 > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > =C2=A0Embedded-Linux / Portierung / Opensource-QM / Verteilte Systeme > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >