From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: erik quanstrom Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 16:36:38 -0400 To: 9fans@9fans.net Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <26297e42fe1ef17befa418ea828c46e1@proxima.alt.za> References: <26297e42fe1ef17befa418ea828c46e1@proxima.alt.za> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [9fans] syscall 53 Topicbox-Message-UUID: eb421266-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 > Ergo: Plan 9 does not (yet?) contain sufficient tools to be > self-sustaining. we've managed for years.... > at it; it needs firm buy-in by the community. I, for one, would need > some hard sell to consider patch and its offspring as sufficient and > much more to convince me that it would be technically superior to > codereview, others may well be even more hard-assed than I am, and > their skills and contributions are too important to sacrifice. i'd encourage you to try participating with apatch, and the mailing list. i would find specific issues easier to reason about than "technically superior". - erik