From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: From: David Presotto To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] rc here docs In-Reply-To: <57dbcd0684da6830d1654755467e74ad@sdgm.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="upas-flixkatirbtquqxyirvyphqujq" Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2003 21:05:37 -0400 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 260b2cf0-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --upas-flixkatirbtquqxyirvyphqujq Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit So what's the fix? For that matter, what should the semantics be? Should it be correct that while scanning a function body, the action of <; Sun, 31 Aug 2003 20:58:32 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <57dbcd0684da6830d1654755467e74ad@sdgm.net> From: boyd@sdgm.net To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [9fans] rc here docs Sender: 9fans-admin@cse.psu.edu Errors-To: 9fans-admin@cse.psu.edu X-BeenThere: 9fans@cse.psu.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu List-Id: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans.cse.psu.edu> List-Archive: Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2003 20:58:31 -0400 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.4 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME,RCVD_IN_OSIRUSOFT_COM version=2.55 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) this is a a horrible bug: brahma% fn foo { cat <