From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Mon,  2 Sep 2013 17:51:15 -0400
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <f965ca1f8eca907767a9938e0b12c7ef@brasstown.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAKzdPgz7fxw2F46du8fEKfED8=HUJDQKeDasc3Le+V5sVJZopg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <dcdd3b734c68c3d5013c7af8e011530b@proxima.alt.za>
	<cd1f50940cd4373e92becbe810ad5eb6@brasstown.quanstro.net>
	<20130902181554.GD8567@iota.offblast.org>
	<CAKzdPgz7fxw2F46du8fEKfED8=HUJDQKeDasc3Le+V5sVJZopg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] Building Go/386
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 793c4c68-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Mon Sep  2 16:51:31 EDT 2013, robpike@gmail.com wrote:
> I'm pretty sure C defines the include path to be relative to the file
> that includes it. The compiler's working directory should be
> irrelevant. I'm also pretty sure Plan 9's compiler gets this right, or
> at least used to. So more information is required.

that still works, otherwise the kernel would not compile.

- erik