From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <f97779810ab82d48e1faa7846f317ea2@proxima.alt.za>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] killing processes
From: Lucio De Re <lucio@proxima.alt.za>
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 18:01:56 +0200
In-Reply-To: <ee9e417a05091708216f670a7f@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 8c213328-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> You can do that with plan9.ini: set up two different
> [whatever] sections with root= and cfs= lines.
> It's only when you're typing the root at root is from:
> that you get in trouble, because there is no cache is from:
> prompt.

In other words, Sape's complaints is more highlighting a surmountable
drawback than really suggesting that cacheing isn't usable.  He gave
the impression that he'd stopped useing cacheing because of this.

I guess in a high-bandwidth environment the additional administration
required wouldn't be justified, but as bandwidth becomes more scarce,
cacheing increases in value.

++L