From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <fa076f17e1f6e7aba38dbf9188b44b73@centurytel.net>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: RE: [9fans] troff problem
From: "Skip Tavakkolian" <fst@centurytel.net>
In-Reply-To: <69f1386aa66e6d93dbaf1fded797c4c7@collyer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 01:44:31 -0800
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 90f75fe8-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

> See /sys/lib/lp/bin/lpscratch; apparently it's not mounting your spool
> subtree correctly.

Is there a reason not to bypass lp altogether in this case?  I've been happy
doing this:

troff -ms /sys/doc/utf.ms | aux/tr2post > /tmp/utf.ps

Lp seems to assume a lot.