From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <fa65e4a923dd7e008ba6456be5f2a33f@quanstro.net>
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Mon,  5 Jan 2009 09:13:21 -0500
To: 9fans@9fans.net
In-Reply-To: <b53ffa62b680cb7b2a65caa1cb9c4305@sounine.nanosouffle.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] mkindex of dict(7)
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 79caa52a-ead4-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> /sys/src/cmd/dict/dict.c states:
> /*
>  * Assumed index file structure: lines of form
>  * 	[^\t]+\t[0-9]+
>  * First field is key, second is byte offset into dictionary.
>  * Should be sorted with args -u -t'	' +0f -1 +0 -1 +1n -2
>  */
>
> whereas, /sys/src/cmd/dict/mkindex outputs:
> <byte offset>	<key>
> i.e.,
> 0	ヽ [くりかえし]
>
> Perhaps, before I dive into thinking I'm fixing things,
> someone would be kind enough to look into the above?
> ak

clearly there was some post processing.
why do you need to regenerate the index?

- erik