From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <fa714d94fcb00094f212a47aa8397d3f@quanstro.net>
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 10:23:46 -0500
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] closeproc slow
In-Reply-To: <858ebb6298e3121386c0507c15527835@swtch.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 86f5fe00-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

that makes sense.

do things happen differently if the process is not slain
but dies a natural death?

- erik

On Sun Jul 23 10:32:39 CDT 2006, rsc@swtch.com wrote:
> Your processes died a quick and painless death.
> The closeproc helpers, called upon to clean up after
> the battle, leave at a rate of one per five seconds.
>
> I was trying to avoid repeatedly creating and deleting
> processes if someone is killing procs frequently.
> In that case, the right number of closeprocs will stick
> around and get reused.
>
> Russ