From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 11:11:08 +0100 From: "Lorenzo Fernando Bivens de la Fuente" To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] X Window System In-Reply-To: <1190553102.693814.317030@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_10292_1939920.1190628668994" References: <1190553102.693814.317030@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com> Topicbox-Message-UUID: c3956138-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 ------=_Part_10292_1939920.1190628668994 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline I has already been done. Look for it in "sources"... (But I don't see a good reason to use it/ do it again) Cheers! On 9/24/07, pavlovetsky@gmail.com wrote: > > What would be the difficulties if someone wishes to port X to Plan 9 > and wants to see it running independently of rio? Any ideas, from > technical point of view? > ------=_Part_10292_1939920.1190628668994 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline I has already been done.

Look for it in "sources"...

(But I don't see a good reason to use it/ do it again)

Cheers!

On 9/24/07, pavlovetsky@gmail.com <pavlovetsky@gmail.com> wrote:
What would be the difficulties if someone wishes to port X to Plan 9
and wants to see it running independently of rio? Any ideas, from
technical point of view?

------=_Part_10292_1939920.1190628668994--