From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <fb4c8d190806131358q766f6a50l5ad2d41157b9f846@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 15:58:36 -0500
From: "Lorenzo Fernando Bivens de la Fuente" <lorenzobivens@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@9fans.net>
In-Reply-To: <9615579a8e77006ca4d9d0fc0a484b0c@quanstro.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <c1449ebc705b7366d3c9d4635427f389@terzarima.net>
	<9615579a8e77006ca4d9d0fc0a484b0c@quanstro.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] I/O load crashes Qemu
Topicbox-Message-UUID: c0220d7a-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

Any good recommended lecture to learn about good virtualization?

I imagine that the biggest issue is to avoid a racing condition
between the two(or 'n') running kernels.

Then... Would it be very hard to build an fs that allows to share real
hardware with another kernel running alongside plan 9? I imagine that
the so called hypervisors are kind of a "(exo-)scheduler"

A not very educated guess...

On 6/13/08, erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net> wrote:
> > the peculiar thing about the modern virtualisers/hypervisors etc is that
>  > they require specialised drivers but are no easier (often harder) to drive than
>  > actual hardware!  it's all gone wrong!
>
>
> but the blinding performance is ... check that.
>
>
>  - erik
>
>
>