Re: [9fans] Okay, who's been playing with the cheese wiz?

["Russ Cox" <rsc@plan9.bell-labs.com>]

Rob and I fixed some other bugs in acme, but not
near the code involved in your Edit 1,$d crash.
I cannot reproduce this.

I changed lib9p to do a few more checks that the
client code is behaving, and your execnet crash
shows that lib9p thinks execnet is not behaving.
It turns out that actually lib9p is not behaving -- I was
trying to clean up this particular detail (whether a
walk function should set both fid->qid and *qid),
because it always confuses me, and I got confused.
I just put out a new srv.c that makes reasonable
demands of the clients.

I gave up on execnet a long time ago.  It's clunky
and not clear that the interface should work that
way.  What do you use it for?  (I'm just curious.)
Copy /386/bin/execnet off of sources and you'll
be happy.

It doesn't surprise me that win is broken.  I always
forget to recompile it because it's not in the /sys/src
tree.  rc: note: peterface is an artifact of an old lib9p
bug that I must have reintroduced.  I will have a look.

I pushed the lib9p changes out on Friday and have
been slowly recompiling binaries for sources as
I know they're okay.  I'm going crazy trying to keep
my laptop, emelie (our internal fs), and sources all
in sync (ironic, I know).  You picked an unfortunate
time to recompile the world.  ;-)

Sorry for the trouble.

Russ