From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:54:53 -0600 From: "Tod Beardsley" To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@9fans.net> In-Reply-To: <112020082105.1433.4925D13700093DA20000059922230682229B0A02D2089B9A019C04040A0DBF9B9D0E9A9B9C040D@att.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <112020081923.14554.4925B93400098179000038DA22230703729B0A02D2089B9A019C04040A0DBF9B9D0E9A9B9C040D@att.net> <3e5c68888a22062ee294de5df8f7c4b4@9srv.net> <112020082105.1433.4925D13700093DA20000059922230682229B0A02D2089B9A019C04040A0DBF9B9D0E9A9B9C040D@att.net> Subject: Re: [9fans] Plan 9 != Inferno... right? Topicbox-Message-UUID: 4cf22cf8-ead4-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 Thanks heaps for your responses. Plan 9 it is then. Expect a lot of really irritating questions over the next few weeks. :) On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Brian L. Stuart wrote: >> I think a more precise way of saying it is that in 9p2000 and >> the new styx, authentication has been moved outside the >> protocol proper. styx==9p now; the names are used by >> convention to imply the auth method, if any. > > You're right. I stand corrected. For some reason I > had thought that the Tauth message was different, > but I see that in both man pages it just carries > the afid obtained by an exchange not specified by > the protocol. > > BLS > > > > -- todb@planb-security.net | ICQ: 335082155 | Note: Due to Google's privacy policy and the United States' policy on electronic surveillance , please do not IM/e-mail me anything you wish to remain secret.