9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@coraid.com>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] Re: what about microkernel?
Date: Mon,  8 Oct 2007 13:16:49 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fd560e48da8617ef67bc97347de7c71b@coraid.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a4e6962a0710080858k4f4974d1h6564f28dff6e6697@mail.gmail.com>

> I've been thinking a lot about this, particularly as we've been diving
> deep into tracing performance of our network paths as part of the Blue
> Gene work.  As of our preliminary results, it would seem that Plan 9
> attempts to take the most general approach to things with an emphasis
> on keeping everything simple.  Unfortunately we end up paying a heavy
> price in raw performance (at least in the networking case).

i have found plan 9 ip networking does not fair well pushing ip networking
at 10gbps, especially tcp, and especially with standard ethernet frames.

i didn't spend enough time this spring with the tcp stack to understand what
it's doing, but i got the impression that it could make the simple case
of receiving packets in order simplier at the expence of misorderd packets.

fwiw, we get much greater performance pushing AoE.  so i don't think
that network queues themselves are the problem.

- erik


  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-10-08 17:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-10-06 13:25 [9fans] " Andrew Wingorodov
2007-10-06 16:07 ` Lorenzo Fernando Bivens de la Fuente
2007-10-06 16:08 ` johnny
2007-10-06 16:26 ` Charles Forsyth
2007-10-06 20:24   ` [9fans] " Andrew Wingorodov
2007-10-06 20:50     ` Charles Forsyth
2007-10-07 16:18       ` David Leimbach
2007-10-07 16:30         ` ron minnich
2007-10-07 18:05           ` erik quanstrom
2007-10-07 20:28           ` David Leimbach
2007-10-07 20:49             ` Francisco J Ballesteros
2007-10-08 13:20               ` LiteStar numnums
2007-10-08 13:27                 ` Charles Forsyth
2007-10-08 14:50                 ` erik quanstrom
2007-10-08 15:58                   ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2007-10-08 16:01                     ` Francisco J Ballesteros
2007-10-08 17:16                     ` erik quanstrom [this message]
2007-10-08 19:14                       ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2007-10-08 19:53                         ` Charles Forsyth
2007-10-08 20:18                           ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2007-10-10 18:26                             ` David Leimbach
2007-10-10 20:42                               ` ron minnich
2007-10-10 21:38                                 ` David Leimbach
2007-10-08 17:46                     ` Charles Forsyth
2007-10-08 18:39                       ` David Leimbach
2007-10-08 19:11                       ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2007-10-08 18:34                     ` David Leimbach
2007-10-07 16:31         ` LiteStar numnums
2007-10-07 18:36         ` Andrew Wingorodov
2007-10-07 18:54           ` LiteStar numnums
2007-10-07 20:20           ` David Leimbach
2007-10-13  7:08 ` Andrew Wingorodov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fd560e48da8617ef67bc97347de7c71b@coraid.com \
    --to=quanstro@coraid.com \
    --cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).