From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <fd752d4f8343a2f8218a5e67a42e9a81@9netics.com>
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Date: Tue,  8 Jul 2008 10:19:51 -0700
From: Skip Tavakkolian <9nut@9netics.com>
In-Reply-To: <d4f625010045271878765374f9fc8d8c@hera.eonet.ne.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] why not Lvx for Plan 9?
Topicbox-Message-UUID: dec3969a-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> However, I have somewhat confused mind.... Why it's not Linux vx for
> Plan9?   I have no intention to make it bad, however, if we believe
> Plan 9 is better than Linux, then Linux vx for Plan9 should be more
> neccessary, shouldn't ?

i'm not sure if this was the authors' intent, but making plan9 easily
accessible to a larger group (mac, linux and someday windows users)
will make plan9 more popular.  vxlinux under plan9 will be useful,
but only to us 9fans.