9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: andrey mirtchovski <mirtchov@cpsc.ucalgary.ca>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] parallel programming in Plan 9
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 22:00:34 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fe25c680965a2bf7e824e5af346f7180@plan9.ucalgary.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4033D2CF.3030208@unm.edu>

> Does someone mind explaining to me the advantages of using Plan 9 to 
> write/run parallel programs over say writing a "traditional" parallel 
> program using MPI? 

There was an MPI implementation using Plan 9 cross-system mounts.
There were even talks of rewriting it as a proper file system.  The
paper was rejected because a) nobody cares about reliability; b)
everybody cares about squeezing the last 15µs out of their
implementation; c) plan9 won't be interesting as research for a while
more -- Linux is where it's at; d) the paper wasn't all that good.

I can tell you where it is, if you're really interested.

As for Plan 9 vs MPI -- as Presotto said, threads and lightweight
procs are perfect for handling load on a single machine (SMP
preferably -- you should see how two or more cpus "soak load", to use
Geoff's words, under Plan 9).  You wouldn't get a fast MPI
imlementation under Plan 9 unless you dig very deep into the OS, but
then you can't beat Plan 9 for exporting services and interfaces for
them (file servers) for others to use.

Currently restricted to Plan 9-based clients only :)

andrey



  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-02-19  5:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-02-18 21:02 James Horey
2004-02-18 21:17 ` Scott Schwartz
2004-02-18 22:36   ` James Horey
2004-02-18 22:52     ` David Presotto
2004-02-18 23:23     ` Scott Schwartz
2004-02-19  5:00 ` andrey mirtchovski [this message]
2004-02-19 14:35   ` ron minnich
2004-02-19 14:40     ` boyd, rounin
2004-02-18 21:17 David Presotto
2004-02-19 19:18 ` rog

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fe25c680965a2bf7e824e5af346f7180@plan9.ucalgary.ca \
    --to=mirtchov@cpsc.ucalgary.ca \
    --cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).