From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <fe41879c0908232053t2808d9b6wf1484c5134b0375c@mail.gmail.com>
References: <fe41879c0908231911n14848f1dnfb5b1eab45ab019a@mail.gmail.com>
	<a633dd307a37f09d92fb4fef59eb5999@quanstro.net>
	<fe41879c0908232053t2808d9b6wf1484c5134b0375c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 16:38:51 -0400
Message-ID: <fe41879c0908241338o309657d0t7a9ab0702891055a@mail.gmail.com>
From: Akshat Kumar <akumar@mail.nanosouffle.net>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] Using cwfs
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 523af6c6-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

I believe there may be an inconsistency somewhere
in the dump records themselves. When I tried to
copy back the file from the dump, into the active
fs, after a while of copying, cwfs panicked with:

main grow ...
    tag = 5/23; expected 757/7 -- not flushed
panic: cwio: checktag c bucket
halted ...

So I ran a `check' after starting up cwfs again, but
nbad = 0
nqbad = 0
although
nmiss = 224455
and still I don't know whether the nmiss is something
that ought to be fixed, or how.
Anyways, the check doesn't seem to reveal any
tag inconsistencies - any suggestions for further tests
in revealing what might be the issue? Or possible
fixes?


Thanks,
ak