From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <82dce0ac7c4f45cdf0c258b3572dc5e3@quanstro.net> References: <82dce0ac7c4f45cdf0c258b3572dc5e3@quanstro.net> Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 21:24:11 -0400 Message-ID: From: Akshat Kumar To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [9fans] Using cwfs Topicbox-Message-UUID: 5385b7b4-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 > this sounds like a bug in usb/disk. usb/disk should be > able to handle a sleeping drive without passing i/o > errors up. That's probably a USB issue, yes. However, now, I've setup my drive not to go into sleep mode at all, but I see the following from earlier today: ... 89806 blocks queued for worm 0 falsehits next dump at ... next dump at ... wrenread: error on w0(1691022): %r 89805 blocks copied to worm where w0 is the disk itself. Note that the final message states 89805 blocks were copied, whereas initially 89806 blocks were queued - was the error on just this one block? If so, what could possibly be the reason? I doubt my USB drive would be acting up. Thanks, ak