From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] telnet From: Charles Forsyth In-Reply-To: <2906846ac9f64a3c0b87ac712e63d125@borf.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="upas-iaesnznyitgvfughylxdervsbn" Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 13:51:16 +0100 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 6a30581e-eacd-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --upas-iaesnznyitgvfughylxdervsbn Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit i've had no trouble with that on the networks i use. my cable supplier gives me a full proper ipv4 connection. rj45 and off i go. i can see how some firewalls and some nat might get in the way depending on capability or configuration. --upas-iaesnznyitgvfughylxdervsbn Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Received: from mail.cse.psu.edu ([130.203.4.6]) by lavoro; Fri Apr 23 13:42:37 BST 2004 Received: by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server, from userid 60001) id CDAE61A0D1; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 08:43:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from psuvax1.cse.psu.edu (psuvax1.cse.psu.edu [130.203.4.6]) by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with ESMTP id 762021A0CC; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 08:43:24 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Delivered-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Received: by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server, from userid 60001) id 042321A111; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 08:42:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from edsac.borf.com (unknown [209.179.94.84]) by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with ESMTP id 2008B1A091 for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 08:42:18 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <2906846ac9f64a3c0b87ac712e63d125@borf.com> To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] telnet From: Brantley Coile In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: 9fans-admin@cse.psu.edu Errors-To: 9fans-admin@cse.psu.edu X-BeenThere: 9fans@cse.psu.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu List-Id: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans.cse.psu.edu> List-Archive: Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 08:38:34 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on psuvax1.cse.psu.edu X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Level: > on small devices i sometimes ditch tcp completely in favour of il and/or > other things. Back in 1996 we tried to use il over the Cisco internal network. Somewhere in the network some one was filtering out non-standard protocol packets. (I know that's broken.) What has been your experience in using il across public networks? I would like to use it in an application, maybe. --upas-iaesnznyitgvfughylxdervsbn--