From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 To: <9fans@9fans.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 06:17:43 -0600 From: EBo In-Reply-To: References: <9cf6ac2467fb616ae6179a1571097524@swcp.com> <5130b2aabdae5ca71951f5428422d5a7@terzarima.net> Message-ID: User-Agent: RoundCube Webmail/0.4-trunk Subject: Re: [9fans] plan9 go output faults on 9vx with rfork Topicbox-Message-UUID: a0fdb194-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 17:18:30 -0800, ron minnich wrote: > On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Charles Forsyth > wrote: >>> So, what changes are needed to set it up for full 64bit? >> >> i'm confused. why would you bother if you can only run 32-bit x86 >> code in vx32? > > I'm not sure either, unless there is some feeling that it runs better > as a 64-bit binary. Every once and awhile I get bit by a 32/64 bit compatibility issue, and was curious. I like to keep general track of things so that I have some idea of how much work things are going to be if I get a wild hair and decide to tackle something. Dealing with vx32 (to make it vx64 I guess) would probably be the hair puller. EBo --