From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <febc15182c3a377b7347fbbf8f758b23@quanstro.net>
To: 9fans@9fans.net
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Mon,  2 Feb 2009 12:10:13 -0500
In-Reply-To: <13426df10902020907i6d47634dj9a3c9ff1afb3f77a@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] 9vx as a cpu server?
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 922c6036-ead4-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> They depend on it now more than ever. Don't believe me? Just look at
> what port many people use for NFS nowadays.
>
> Lots of bad things have never been fixed, and this is one of them. I
> guess it's more fun to lard GUI software over top and hope nobody
> notices.

too bad that there seems to be more willingness to
break perfectly okay interfaces that there is to
fix broken interfaces.  the compatability argument
seems to run counter common sense in both cases.

- erik