From: Akshat Kumar <akumar@mail.nanosouffle.net>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Distributed Pipelines
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 13:00:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <g2ofe41879c1004261300sb80d702dy9f2a491801c603a9@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <23E784B6-F189-4DFC-AA82-21CA950DD77D@gmail.com>
For the record: rx(1) man pages imply
the sort of behaviour from rx(1) that I
would like:
"...
eqn paper | rx kremvax troff -ms | rx deepthought lp
Parallel processing: do each stage of a pipeline on a
different machine.
"
however, it seems not to work this way.
My basic test has been something like:
echo '1 2 3' | rx $cpu awk -f $home/comp.awk | gview
... just a simple sample use case.
Is there something special about awk(1)
that would cause it not to receive
standard input the way rx(1) provides it?
Even just:
rx $cpu awk -f $home/comp.awk
wants to take standard input, but
apparently doesn't get it.
Thanks,
ak
On 4/26/10, Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@gmail.com> wrote:
> The version there is Plan9ports and should work under Plan 9 as well -- if
> it doesn't, beat on Noah :)
>
> -eric
>
> On Apr 26, 2010, at 9:33 AM, Akshat Kumar wrote:
>
>> Hi Eric,
>>
>> The only reference to PUSH I see is
>> at http://code.google.com/p/push
>> where the site reads,
>>
>> "This is the new unix port of push."
>>
>> Where might I find the native Plan 9
>> version?
>>
>>
>> Best,
>> ak
>>
>>
>> On 4/25/10, Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Take a look at Noah's PUSH shell. It's not there yet, but maybe later
>>> today.
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>> On Apr 26, 2010, at 2:50 AM, Akshat Kumar
>>> <akumar@mail.nanosouffle.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks Steve,
>>>>
>>>> rx $cpu 'procdata' | process
>>>>
>>>> works well for one way.
>>>> However,
>>>>
>>>> procdata | rx $cpu 'process'
>>>>
>>>> is in the same way as with cpu(1).
>>>> Any suggestions for piping in that
>>>> direction?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> ak
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 5:40 PM, Steve Simon <steve@quintile.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> cpu -c 'procdata' | process
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>> Perhaps I'm overlooking some simple solutions here.
>>>>>> Any suggestions?
>>>>>
>>>>> cpu(1) works by starting exportfs on the remote machine and serving
>>>>> the local machines filespace. The remote shell is started with its
>>>>> stdin/out/err attached to /mnt/term/dev/cons, thus the command you
>>>>> tried will not work (by design).
>>>>>
>>>>> what you want is rx(1) which does exactly what you want, somthing
>>>>> like rsh(1) from the Unix world, except it uses plan9' secure
>>>>> authentication; e.g.:
>>>>>
>>>>> rx $cpu | process
>>>>>
>>>>> -Steve
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-26 20:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-25 23:56 Akshat Kumar
2010-04-26 0:40 ` Steve Simon
2010-04-26 0:50 ` Akshat Kumar
2010-04-26 5:45 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2010-04-26 7:33 ` Akshat Kumar
2010-04-26 7:55 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2010-04-26 20:00 ` Akshat Kumar [this message]
2010-04-26 21:20 ` erik quanstrom
2010-04-26 21:57 ` Akshat Kumar
2010-04-26 22:17 ` erik quanstrom
2010-04-27 8:48 ` Derek Fawcus
2010-04-27 4:29 ` Tim Newsham
2010-04-27 4:31 ` lucio
2010-04-27 12:04 ` erik quanstrom
2010-04-27 12:46 ` erik quanstrom
2010-05-01 18:51 ` Ryousei Takano
2010-05-01 19:40 ` David du Colombier
2010-05-03 3:19 ` Ryousei Takano
2010-05-03 18:10 ` David du Colombier
2010-05-03 20:22 ` Russ Cox
2010-05-04 15:46 ` Jorden M
2010-05-04 17:44 ` ron minnich
2010-05-04 18:16 ` erik quanstrom
2010-05-04 18:36 ` ron minnich
2010-05-04 18:50 ` erik quanstrom
2010-05-04 19:51 ` Russ Cox
2010-05-04 19:59 ` erik quanstrom
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=g2ofe41879c1004261300sb80d702dy9f2a491801c603a9@mail.gmail.com \
--to=akumar@mail.nanosouffle.net \
--cc=9fans@9fans.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).