From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <74bab30800fb07a2511d904bb2ea4b95@kw.quanstro.net>
References: <k2hfe41879c1004251656id6976800scb02b96f89f5cb40@mail.gmail.com>
	<fba0cac2c9a2d1add33cd834fb31253d@quintile.net>
	<w2lfe41879c1004251750y1cb77ea9ob221543f0506ccb7@mail.gmail.com>
	<A49BBF89-41D7-4AFE-BDCF-D0BF246879CB@gmail.com>
	<z2tfe41879c1004260033q204491f4zfc717d6cf80ffdd1@mail.gmail.com>
	<23E784B6-F189-4DFC-AA82-21CA950DD77D@gmail.com>
	<g2ofe41879c1004261300sb80d702dy9f2a491801c603a9@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.BSI.4.64.1004261828060.19994@malasada.lava.net>
	<74bab30800fb07a2511d904bb2ea4b95@kw.quanstro.net>
Date: Sun,  2 May 2010 03:51:10 +0900
Message-ID: <i2gb30d1c3b1005011151r422918f9t3da58823db78e93@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ryousei Takano <ryousei@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [9fans] Distributed Pipelines
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 16620ad0-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 9:46 PM, erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net> wro=
te:
> On Tue Apr 27 00:31:03 EDT 2010, newsham@lava.net wrote:
>> What about some mounting/binding hackery where you replace
>> /dev/cons so that the original "cpu" command works?
>
> why the resistance to il? =A0rx is a good example of il's strengths.
> in order for cpu to work, it uses 2 extra processes. =A0rx is much
> more efficient. =A0(and 1/4 the code) great for your trusted network.
> or perhaps your local supercomputer.
>
> rx doesn't do encryption. =A0a srx using ssl/tls would be
> able to sneak a 0 write through since the record layer
> should expand that into a application record with
> application data length of 0.
>
I became interested in IL protocol.
Please tell me why IL is removed from the main distribution.

Thanks,
Ryousei