From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <9d193432a6a51ef9654e8f660a89208b@kw.quanstro.net>
References: <r2t13426df11004271038h4876458al396c1b9f24d8c687@mail.gmail.com>
	<7f475b26c603e926bdc945ab895d6ec5@9srv.net>
	<r2q7d3530221004271057sc011fe06z782eff50b276881d@mail.gmail.com>
	<9d193432a6a51ef9654e8f660a89208b@kw.quanstro.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 15:21:45 -0700
Message-ID: <i2v13426df11004271521l4898cb9bke617aeaa972b1ea6@mail.gmail.com>
From: ron minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [9fans] A simple experiment
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 1022d654-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 10:59 AM, erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net> wr=
ote:

> it would be interesting to try. =A0if hg can push in parallel, it
> could be competitive. =A0fetching the iso, decompressing the iso,
> etc are not free. =A0and you can't push anything until after step
> 2. =A0talk about killer latency.

pulling and decompressing the iso are far, far faster for me than
replica. There's no comparison.

ron