From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <p2gc81a07351005011548qe65a599s18f274760a018520@mail.gmail.com>
References: <m2jd1c554291005011449v18e24aafiae20420de4dbc976@mail.gmail.com>
	<eb01a9fbf82ceba375cdf6fc400c0b57@terzarima.net>
	<p2gc81a07351005011548qe65a599s18f274760a018520@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat,  1 May 2010 23:06:25 +0000
Message-ID: <i2y13426df11005011606nc52efd56qf4e5a5f52fe0f3d4@mail.gmail.com>
From: ron minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: Re: [9fans] 9vx and ubuntu 10.04LTS
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 16faf8a8-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 10:48 PM, Vinu Rajashekhar <vinutheraj@gmail.com> wrote:
> The address shown by ldd can even vary from run to run, for the same file -

yeah it's a feechur.

But still all my libs are living in high half of 32-bit space on a
running instance.

The two LOAD segments on my 9vx are :
  LOAD           0x000000 0x08048000 0x08048000 0x6f2f4 0x6f2f4 R E 0x1000
  LOAD           0x06fefc 0x080b8efc 0x080b8efc 0x77204 0x18b81c RW  0x1000

What are yours after building?

This is my libc: /lib/libc.so.6 -> libc-2.9.so

ron