Hmmm is Op the same Op from Octopus?<div><br></div><div>Just making sure.<br><div><br></div><div>Dave<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Skip Tavakkolian <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:9nut@9netics.com">9nut@9netics.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">i think in almost all cases putting Op between 9P endpoints will<br>
solve the slowness problem of high rtt networks.<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
&gt;&gt; But then I start to wonder why we feel we want to compete with HTTP when it<br>
&gt;&gt;&gt; already works, and is still fairly simple.  Nothing wrong with improving<br>
&gt;&gt;&gt; 9P<br>
&gt;&gt;&gt; I suppose, but what&#39;s so wrong with HTTP transfers that it warrants<br>
&gt;&gt;&gt; changing<br>
&gt;&gt;&gt; our beloved resource sharing protocol?  Maybe I&#39;m being too practical, and<br>
&gt;&gt;&gt; not feeling adventurous or something :-)<br>
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt; See the &quot;op&quot; papers for their justification.<br>
&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Will do!<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt;  Dave<br>
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt; Tim Newsham | <a href="http://www.thenewsh.com/~newsham" target="_blank">www.thenewsh.com/~newsham</a> | <a href="http://thenewsh.blogspot.com" target="_blank">thenewsh.blogspot.com</a><br>
&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt;<br>
<br>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div>