From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <9c9e4b12769a946cad1659bb2a83fe0c@coraid.com> References: <46914d2c-437d-406e-a928-123f4d09f9f7@u15g2000prd.googlegroups.com> <2a514b8f79dfb3434a836f743f936bb2@brasstown.quanstro.net> <9c9e4b12769a946cad1659bb2a83fe0c@coraid.com> Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 16:11:39 +0200 Message-ID: From: hiro <23hiro@googlemail.com> To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [9fans] /sys/lib/newuser patch Topicbox-Message-UUID: ffac38c4-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 I have not the slightest idea about the complexity involved; And I think I misunderstand how much of plan9 is actually running in a sandbox. But what if we wanted to have a working security system for multiple users in 9vx. Would it be - or is it - possible? On 4/12/10, erik quanstrom wrote: >> Can't we then fix 9vx? >> (Stepping in to the tradition of concern of reception: This is not a >> rhetoric question) > > it's not 9vx, but #Z. and no, #Z is going to be limited by > the underlying system. > > - erik > >