From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Tue,  7 Jan 2014 00:02:38 +0000
Message-ID: <m2eh4k3bhd.wl%phineas.pett@gmail.com>
From: phineas.pett@gmail.com
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
In-Reply-To: <52CAF519.9010909@yahoo.fr>
References: <m2k3eg3ek8.wl%phineas.pett@gmail.com>
	<f2d5f3d2-0209-47ac-9887-55eab60b353d@email.android.com>
	<m2ioty2umn.wl%phineas.pett@gmail.com>
	<CANZw+5c5QXE8V1kxdPTFbaeLXfZaJJm8-pUzppv5NSfgBZhRqg@mail.gmail.com>
	<52CAF519.9010909@yahoo.fr>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI-EPG/1.14.7 (Harue)
	FLIM/1.14.9 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Goj=F2?=) APEL/10.8 EasyPG/1.0.0 Emacs/24.3
	(x86_64-apple-darwin) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Subject: Re: [9fans] Alternative Plan 9 Logo
Topicbox-Message-UUID: af77096c-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

At Mon, 06 Jan 2014 19:25:29 +0100,
Nicolas Bercher wrote:
>
> On 05/01/2014 19:09, Shane Morris wrote:
> > "Plan 9 Inside"?

I was trying to suggest `recursion' on one level, and perhaps
`expanding development' on another---though `nine inside' is a clever
angle.

> No, it's just Plan 9 inside 9 inside 9 inside 9 inside 9. (-;
>
> Nicolas

Nine 9s would have been symbolically better, but it cannot be made to
work graphically unless the scale is enormous.  At screen resolution
the centre just becomes blurred.  I had to settle for six nines (three
positive, three negative).

Peter