From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20100415182618.GA9844@polynum.com> Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 15:51:06 -0300 Message-ID: From: "Federico G. Benavento" To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [9fans] APE: a further note. Topicbox-Message-UUID: 029c1810-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 -T with in APE for lunix code doesn't cut it without hand editing tons of it, there's always a function prototype missing or even conflicting... hand depending on the size of the project it can be unmanageable... On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 3:30 PM, erik quanstrom wro= te: >> gcc(1) is very verbose (well: I always set -Wall). ken-cc >> is---surprise---more laconic; but when he was saying: no! he was right, >> for things that were going silently under NetBSD. > > compile with -FVTw. =C2=A0-T causes type signatures to be > emitted. =C2=A0the linker won't link mismatched type signatures. > i've found this to be very useful. > > - erik > > --=20 Federico G. Benavento