From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 01:04:54 +0200 Message-ID: From: Francisco J Ballesteros To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [9fans] A simple experiment Topicbox-Message-UUID: 11fe1ac4-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 yes and no. Yes in that you can use inferno + op to bridge plan 9 systems. No in that there's no native implementation yet. On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:18 PM, Skip Tavakkolian <9nut@9netics.com> wrote= : >>> We did a simple experiment recently: added a new 9p type called >>> Tstream, because this issue of streams vs. transactions has been >>> bugging me for years. The semantics are simple: it's a lot like Tread >>> (almost same packet) but a single Tstream results in any number of >>> Rstreams, until you hit no more data (/dev/mouse) or maybe EOF >>> (/usr/rminnich/movie). Andrey tossed a sample implementation into >>> newsham's 9p library. We =C2=A0saw a 27x improvement in performance fro= m >>> calgary to sandia for a big file. Fcp did not come close. >> >> That's similar to a Tget in op with unlimited replies. The difference ad= ds on >> quickly. > > i was going to ask if anyone has tried this with op. =C2=A0is there an > implementation of oxport/ofs for plan 9? > > >