From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Thu,  3 Jan 2008 22:07:39 +0100
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] opera under linuxemu
From: csant <csant@csant.info>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=utf-8
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <13426df10801021655r28a34e4ep98bdde53f18f447d@mail.gmail.com>
	<32d987d50801021929v1a3c478awdd22daebb96d8aa@mail.gmail.com>
	<20080103083708.GA826@shodan.homeunix.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <op.t4dgy1eed84skq@fiore.malebolge>
In-Reply-To: <20080103083708.GA826@shodan.homeunix.net>
User-Agent: Opera Mail/9.25 (Linux)
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 2659f2b6-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

Hi,

On Thu, 03 Jan 2008 09:37:08 +0100, Martin Neubauer <m.ne@gmx.net> wrote:

> For one, I think opera-static doesn't mean it's a static binary but qt is
> linked in statically. On the other hand, until just a couple years ago

Correct.  Only Qt is linked statically into opera-static.  Also, current  
static Opera (the .1 package, not the experimental .10 package available  
for Opera 9.5)  is compiled with "ancient" gcc 2.95, which "thank god" has  
the advantage of not causing any libstdc++ dependency...

And congrats and *thanks* to cinap for the nice effort :)

/c