From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 00:59:11 +0200
To: 9fans <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Re: 9fans Digest, Vol 27, Issue 52
From: csant <csant@csant.info>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=utf-8
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <83403ad2ab9a0c44be1bef3d89406b63@quanstro.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <op.tc9osx0hd84skq@fiore.malebolge>
In-Reply-To: <83403ad2ab9a0c44be1bef3d89406b63@quanstro.net>
User-Agent: Opera Mail/9.01 (Linux)
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 8d30156c-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 22:17:01 +0200, erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
wrote:

> i think the ideal "browser" for plan 9 would be acme.
>
> if acme could handle a box-based layout with images and text, the
> "web browser" could consist of webfs, http/layout and http/acmectl.

Well, isn't that kind of the way Abaco is going? Acme-like UI + a
rendering engine. Using Acme's MDI was an extremely happy choice for a
browser.