From: csant <csant@csant.info>
To: 9fans <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: [9fans] Sensible fossil+venti partitioning
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 21:07:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <op.tclbe3jwd84skq@fiore.malebolge> (raw)
After my first, fossil-only installation (following defaults), I am
thinking to set up a fossil+venti system on the same partition. What would
a sensible relationship of fossil vs. venti space be, i.e. how much space
makes sense to allocate for each? I am asking, since the installer does
not "suggest a sensible layout" as it already finds the previous
fossil-only installation and suggests that one instead... Not having ever
partitioned a fossil and venti machine, I am lost about what here might be
"sensible".
/c
next reply other threads:[~2006-07-12 19:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-12 19:07 csant [this message]
2006-07-12 20:07 ` Steve Simon
2006-07-12 21:14 ` csant
2006-07-12 22:30 ` Steve Simon
2006-07-13 14:51 ` Richard Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=op.tclbe3jwd84skq@fiore.malebolge \
--to=csant@csant.info \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).