From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 19:38:47 +0200
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] dir tree Qs
From: csant <csant@csant.info>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=utf-8
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <4adb44c7e3b1bd960c949703fcd7b082@vitanuova.com>
	<44E4A5EF.7060709@lanl.gov>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <op.tefvaxd8d84skq@fiore.malebolge>
In-Reply-To: <44E4A5EF.7060709@lanl.gov>
User-Agent: Opera Mail/9.02 (Linux)
Topicbox-Message-UUID: a26e47e6-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> rog@vitanuova.com wrote:
>>> /n is remote servers. /mnt/is local.
>>   /mnt/term ?
>
> yeah, I think that is a tenuous claim (/mnt vs. /n)
>
> I always figured it was that stuff in /mnt was supposed to be in /mnt,  
> otherwise if it was in /n, it was supposed to be in /n?

	/n/dump
is yet another one confusing me. If /mnt stands for "mount", what does /n  
stand for?
/c