From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] g++
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0309120749490.12170-100000@maxroach.lanl.gov> <b9328cc78ff61d390973d0df3aea3f6f@vitanuova.com> <20030914144757.30e9b14c.martin@parvat.com>
Message-ID: <oprvhp3cfvrveh1e@smtp.borf.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed
From: Brantley Coile <brantley@prepaynt.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20030914144757.30e9b14c.martin@parvat.com>
User-Agent: Opera7.11/Win32 M2 build 2887
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 08:53:26 -0400
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 34c37d1a-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

On Sun, 14 Sep 2003 14:47:57 +0530, Martin C.Atkins <martin@parvat.com> wrote:

> Looking back at your previous message, perhaps it is the
> "scope rules and silent actions associated with inheritance", in
> which case are there any "Object Oriented" languages that you think
> are OK?

I'm not Charles, but I also answer.

Have you seen Oberon-2?  It is OO done well.

 Brantley Coile