From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 09:26:44 +0200
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] writing code
References: <dd7d368aa1ecc452b74906560b3d56df@granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp>
From: "Tiit Lankots" <t.lankots@aprote.ee>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=iso-8859-15
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <opsmjdmunb3anw4g@tiitl.aprote.com>
In-Reply-To: <dd7d368aa1ecc452b74906560b3d56df@granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp>
User-Agent: Opera M2/7.54 (Win32, build 3865)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 114b4e4a-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

>> i'd like to see the distinction between cpu server and terminal
>> disappear.
>
> Then, what is the difference between your new scheme and the
> present day unix scheme?
>
> I don't really understand your motivation to make it real...
> You mean all of direct democracy?

Complete hegemony, for one. When every terminal is a (potential)
cpu server - depending on its owner's whim - there will be a
plethora of resources, just waiting to be used. It's somewhat like
what P2P is to FTP.