From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] blanks in file names
References: <200207070402.g6742Ch06066@dave2.dave.tj>
	<3D295FF1.7040403@strakt.com>
From: Berry Kercheval <berry@kerch.com>
In-Reply-To: <3D295FF1.7040403@strakt.com> (Boyd Roberts's message of "Mon, 08 Jul 2002 11:48:33 +0200")
Message-ID: <oy9cl3jmx.fsf@lyorn.kerch.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090003 (Oort Gnus v0.03) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Mon,  8 Jul 2002 16:05:58 -0700
Topicbox-Message-UUID: c5d787a8-eaca-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

Boyd Roberts <boyd@strakt.com> writes:

> Dave wrote:
>  > The method of representation of a given node can be quite flexible
>  > (allowing node completion - or as I would term it, cannonization
>  > - to be done by the kernel),
> 
> I thought the making of saints wasn't exactly in the kernel's job
> description.


Naw, making saints is "canonization".  Making artillery is a perfectly
good kernel task.