From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 22:48:57 -0700 Message-ID: From: Don Bailey To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: [9fans] VMware resolution > 1024? Topicbox-Message-UUID: 79eb20fa-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 Am I missing something? VMware used to have better screen resolution than 1024x768x8, didn't it? I'm getting kernel panic when I try and switch to something higher. Suggestions? Thanks, D From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 09:16:02 -0800 Message-ID: From: David Leimbach To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e64345c434aab00494a1e5ed Subject: Re: [9fans] VMware resolution > 1024? Topicbox-Message-UUID: 7a21590e-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 --0016e64345c434aab00494a1e5ed Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 It's not a solution to your problem, but what I typically like to do for a console these days is use either 9vx or drawterm, and then setup VMWare as a CPU/FS server. Dave On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 9:48 PM, Don Bailey wrote: > Am I missing something? VMware used to have better screen resolution > than 1024x768x8, didn't it? I'm getting kernel panic when I try and > switch to something higher. Suggestions? > > Thanks, > D > > --0016e64345c434aab00494a1e5ed Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 It's not a solution to your problem, but what I typically like to do for a console these days is use either 9vx or drawterm, and then setup VMWare as a CPU/FS server.

Dave

On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 9:48 PM, Don Bailey <don.bailey@gmail.com> wrote:
Am I missing something? VMware used to have better screen resolution
than 1024x768x8, didn't it? I'm getting kernel panic when I try and
switch to something higher. Suggestions?

Thanks,
D


--0016e64345c434aab00494a1e5ed-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 00:00:53 -0700 Message-ID: From: Don Bailey To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [9fans] VMware resolution > 1024? Topicbox-Message-UUID: 7a6b9366-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 Yeah, that's a fair solution. I already have an Auth, CPU, and FS server in my VMware network. I was hoping to use VMware for everything, though. D On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 10:16 AM, David Leimbach wrote: > It's not a solution to your problem, but what I typically like to do for a > console these days is use either 9vx or drawterm, and then setup VMWare as a > CPU/FS server. > Dave > On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 9:48 PM, Don Bailey wrote: >> >> Am I missing something? VMware used to have better screen resolution >> than 1024x768x8, didn't it? I'm getting kernel panic when I try and >> switch to something higher. Suggestions? >> >> Thanks, >> D >> > > From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 04:37:01 -0500 To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> From: "Lawrence E. Bakst" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [9fans] VMware resolution > 1024? Topicbox-Message-UUID: 7a716af2-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 About 1.5 years ago I tried booting plan9 on both VMware Fusion and Parallels. I had used Parallels before for plan9 and knew plan9 had booted in the past. The following is from my imperfect memory and a few notes I have. Both products are pretty good and both booted plan9 for me, but they both had their share of issues for my preferred config. I have a MBP 17" with 1920x1200 screen. It would be nice to use all those pixels, but of course it's just over 8 MB @ 32 bpp. I think that's an issue (for me). It was VMware's Fusion 2.0.2 lack of support for resolutions higher than 1024x768x8 that caused me to stick with Parallels. I actually think Fusion has support for higher (SVGA) resolutions but you have to write to a backdoor, register based, RPC mechanism to turn it on, set the resolution/bpp, and/or map it in. I didn't do it because I could not find any spec for it. It wouldn't be too hard to do if you had a spec. I did find some open source that did hack the VGA settings, but it was riddled with magic numbers and useless comments. If someone has the VMware rpc/SVGA spec, please let me know. Has anyone upgraded to Parallels 6 and tried to boot plan9? I have always found Parallels worked pretty well as long as you set OS Type: "Other" and OS Version: "OpenStep". That config of the VM seems to work the best with plan9. Also: At 8:27 PM -0400 5/17/09, geoff@plan9.bell-labs.com wrote: >Taking the wiki's advice and specifying in plan9.ini > > mouseport=ps2intellimouse > >cures the middle-button problem. I found that Parallels 3 still had problems with middle clicks on external USB mice, but the above fixes the trackpad issues. I suppose the problem could be with my LogTech control panel not creating the middle clicks correctly. I have some notes on all this but should really get to the latest version of everything before I post anything. Nothing worse that old data points. Best, leb At 12:00 AM -0700 11/10/10, Don Bailey wrote: >Yeah, that's a fair solution. I already have an Auth, CPU, and FS >server in my VMware network. I was hoping to use VMware for >everything, though. > >D > >On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 10:16 AM, David Leimbach wrote: >> It's not a solution to your problem, but what I typically like to do for a >> console these days is use either 9vx or drawterm, and then setup VMWare as a >> CPU/FS server. >> Dave >> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 9:48 PM, Don Bailey wrote: >>> >>> Am I missing something? VMware used to have better screen resolution >>> than 1024x768x8, didn't it? I'm getting kernel panic when I try and >>> switch to something higher. Suggestions? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> D >>> >> >> -- leb@iridescent.org