From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <5fa9fbfe115a9cd5a81d0feefe413192@quintile.net> <4fa1305e0f56a0ef89c2e05320fa5997@coraid.com> <40cf59cfc2735e232f0fd67df725e65d@kw.quanstro.net> Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 08:24:41 -0700 Message-ID: From: ron minnich To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [9fans] A simple experiment Topicbox-Message-UUID: 12a48d32-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 8:06 AM, David Leimbach wrote: > I'm totally undecided on this, but just asking the question to make sure > everyone feels good about adding streaming to 9P, which seems to indicate a > need to add flow control as well. the problem of multiplexing several streams onto one stream, with priority and avoiding head of line blocking, was solved a long time ago. Tstream is unlikely to be added to 9p. ron