From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 To: 9fans@9fans.net Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 08:32:46 +0000 From: Balwinder S Dheeman Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: , <20120831222403.GA81150@intma.in>, Subject: Re: [9fans] rc vs sh Topicbox-Message-UUID: b5ad5f62-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On 09/01/2012 04:30 AM, Uriel wrote: > On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 12:24 AM, Kurt H Maier wrote: >> >> Just for the record, nothing's changed: >> >> On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 10:44:04PM +0200, Uriel wrote: >>> Where did the Go team say explicitly they are not interested in a >>> better build system? >> >> http://goo.gl/AtBrC >> > > A lot has changed, the current build system has barely a handful of > lines of (ba)sh left in it. That's good news, but for me the Go is yet another bloatware and nothing more than that :( > Whatever I can convince Russ that it is OK to remove the little that > is left will depend on whatever other people make the case or just > give up and go away, because they can't be bothered to explain their > points to Russ. Or may be Russ is unable to grasp whatever the other volunteers suggest or he is reluctant to accept patches. > Really, that of all the people in the world, I'm the one that has to > try to fight for consensus, communication and cooperation... maybe the > world is really hopeless. *sigh* The world is always live, hopeful and fair; and it shall remain so even when we die. -- Balwinder S "bdheeman" Dheeman (http://werc.homelinux.net/contact/)