From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-Id: From: "David LeBleu" To: <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] What's missing? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Date: Thu, 3 May 2001 15:51:51 -0500 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 999cee18-eac9-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 My primary issue with Charon is that it appears to be unsupportive of XML = or XHTML. Otherwise, I have had few other concerns. Of course, there is = so much to learn/understand about the features and differences between = plan9 and Inferno I can hardly complain . .=20 :-) David A. LeBleu, Systems Analyst TNRCC, State of Texas 512.239.3140 (phone) 512.239.0888 (fax) dlebleu@tnrcc.state.tx.us >>> baldwin@vitanuova.com 04/23/01 12:11PM >>> > This just means we have to write more and more usable applications for = plan9. Yes. Anothy, what are the apps you find a need to use on Unix? As for me, the only one is Netscape (ugh). Our latest Charon on Inferno does a good enough job for most sites that Netscape is actually my backup browser. But it would be nice to not have to use Netscape at all. Even so, my Netscape is actually running on a Solaris box far away; over DSL running VNC is just fine; over dialup it gets the job done, with some impatience.