From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
From: "Patrick R. Wade" <pat_e@efn.org>
Message-ID: <slrn93vr2o.i7d.pat_e@garcia.efn.org>
References: <919uta$3jfnv$1@ID-64718.news.dfncis.de>, <slrn93tfgk.1as.randolph@panix3.panix.com>, <91nt3g$t2f$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
Subject: [9fans] Re: Future of Plan9
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2000 10:00:24 +0000
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 3a7e783e-eac9-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

In article <91nt3g$t2f$1@nnrp1.deja.com>, vecera@writeme.com wrote:
>I like Plan9, I think it has good draft - networking, security,
>namespace (good idea!)...
>But now it needs applications.
>
>BTW: Is anybody going to port tcl/tk lib to Plan9? Or anything else
>which
>will make easy to create menus and buttons and others in apps?
>

There was a "panel" library, but i get the impression it went away with
the change from 8-1/2 to rio.  Perhaps it will re-surface.


-- 
	if(rp->p_flag&SSWAP) {
		rp->p_flag =& ~SSWAP;
		aretu(u.u_ssav);
	}