From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
From: Randolph Fritz <randolph@panix.com>
Message-ID: <slrn99nqg8.6jo.randolph@panix6.panix.com>
References: <SAK.2001.02.27.gkqasqte@freeze2k>, <21714.983270343@dstc.edu.au>
Subject: Re: [9fans] povray on p9
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 18:10:05 +0000
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 6aa1e9f6-eac9-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

On Tue, 27 Feb 2001 10:55:24 GMT, George Michaelson <ggm@dstc.edu.au> wrote:
>
>don't go past radiance without a look. its not povray but its very good.
>
>real architects use it for lighting studies.
>

Oh someone else on this list uses Radiance!  But it has a different
goal from most rendering tools; the Radiance developers have tried
very hard to make it predict physical lighting.

Randolph