From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 12:38:31 -0700
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@9fans.net>,
	"ron minnich" <rminnich@gmail.com>
From: "EBo" <ebo@sandien.com>
Message-ID: <twig.1268509111.65424@swcp.com>
In-Reply-To: <13426df11003120853p3b0e17c1h8f757cdf15ef7385@mail.gmail.com>
References: <138575261003120253t4eb3a9b6k4d5902288c8c8f3@mail.gmail.com>
	<a81fe9be1003120744t4342a6bkcebe9acf0626b830@mail.gmail.com>,
	<a81fe9be1003120744t4342a6bkcebe9acf0626b830@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [9fans] plan9 on qemu and 9vx
Topicbox-Message-UUID: e7f28f80-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025


> Unless there's some compelling reason to use qemu (I can't think of
> one) why not just use 9vx exclusively? I've made a transition over the
> years:
> qemu
> xen
> kvm
> lguest
> 9vx
>
> And am stuck at 9vx ...

So, are you more interested in 9vx than lguest?  Or have I misinterpreted what
you ment by stuck ;-)

  EBo --