From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 18:20:13 -0700
To: "ron minnich" <rminnich@gmail.com>, <ebo@sandien.com>
From: "EBo" <ebo@sandien.com>
Message-ID: <twig.1268529613.77881@swcp.com>
In-Reply-To: <13426df11003131300y20cda1e9ve3dd0b88238ba05b@mail.gmail.com>
References: <138575261003120253t4eb3a9b6k4d5902288c8c8f3@mail.gmail.com>
	<a81fe9be1003120744t4342a6bkcebe9acf0626b830@mail.gmail.com>
	<13426df11003120853p3b0e17c1h8f757cdf15ef7385@mail.gmail.com>
	<twig.1268509111.65424@swcp.com>, <twig.1268509111.65424@swcp.com>
Cc: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] plan9 on qemu and 9vx
Topicbox-Message-UUID: e7fe0734-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025


> > So, are you more interested in 9vx than lguest? �Or have I
> > misinterpreted what you ment by stuck ;-)
>
> Just going by performance and portability, 9vx is a way better way to
> go than lguest.

I have to take a look at it later then.

  EBo --