From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 19:07:19 -0600
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@9fans.net>,
	"erik quanstrom" <quanstro@quanstro.net>
From: "EBo" <ebo@sandien.com>
Message-ID: <twig.1269565639.42165@swcp.com>
In-Reply-To: <9ba4742692988b7002e86471468b23be@brasstown.quanstro.net>
References: <20100325114948.GA7249@polynum.com>
	<972b97fa673cbb799c3df1e0a4524408@ladd.quanstro.net>
	<20100325153152.GA168@polynum.com>,
	<20100325153152.GA168@polynum.com>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Man pages for add-ons
Topicbox-Message-UUID: f30b019a-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net> said:

> > I'm inclined to this kind of stuff too, since it's easy to "rm -fr" if
> > everything is simply in the same place.
>
> replica should make such concerns moot.

I've taken a quick look at the docs, but it is intended to be a per-package
management tool?  Typically my concerns are setting up canonical
versions/'dates which are known to be stable so testing can be done on
multiple known code revisions.  How does one do that with replica?


  EBo --