Got it!  Changed.  I'll also change it along the lines of Erik's suggestion.

As a note, I thought that 9vx ran on top of the p9p stuff.

  Thanks again,

  EBo --


"Devon H. O'Dell" <devon.odell@gmail.com> said:

> 2010/4/11 EBo <ebo@sandien.com>:
> > I thought p9p uses it for the root of the Plan 9 tree? �At least that is what
> > the ebuilds imply. �Maybe I am using the wrong term for what PLAN9 points to.
>
> That's true, but in the case of 9vx, the tree it points to contains
> actual plan 9 binaries, whereas p9p binaries are compiled for the host
> system. Since it is very feasible that someone may run p9p and 9vx on
> the same machine (I do, for instance), it would be a good idea to not
> overload the env var.
>
> --dho
>
> > �EBo --
> >
> >
> > erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net> said:
> >
> >> recommend using a different environment variable
> >> other than PLAN9, since that is taken by p9p to mean
> >> something else.
> >>
> >> - erik
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>



--