From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 12:24:12 -0600 To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@9fans.net>, "Eric Van Hensbergen" From: "EBo" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: <5fa9fbfe115a9cd5a81d0feefe413192@quintile.net> <4fa1305e0f56a0ef89c2e05320fa5997@coraid.com> <43de5c2167c0a4851aeafaa07a0b982d@kw.quanstro.net> <816a521c149b06088f5023d3dfddf0ed@kw.quanstro.net> , Subject: Re: [9fans] A simple experiment Topicbox-Message-UUID: 12f3acdc-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 > >> 9P doesn't require any flow control? �That doesn't seem right :-) �But then > >> again it doesn't stream, at least in the traditional way I think of > >> streaming. �To stream you typically need flow control, so 9P isn't good for > >> streaming in the sense I think of streaming. (yet?) > >> Fix 9P or don't is the decision to be made. > > > > it's going to get fixed. > > Well, its being fixed. Whether or not it gets back-ported to Plan 9 > is the question :) Where is the fix happening? Maybe there are people around that are willing to help back-port :-) EBo --