From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <af258d5ea0a167391f51be82bf5791c6@coraid.com>
References: <r2h68eb39921004150952ga0e24c71p2e55bffa835d3bcb@mail.gmail.com>
	<i2jf4d8fa41004151027z475a4f65h9fcac6292b3cfde4@mail.gmail.com>
	<af258d5ea0a167391f51be82bf5791c6@coraid.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 01:19:43 +0200
Message-ID: <u2if4d8fa41004151619x65296b54o4ee297734ebefe6f@mail.gmail.com>
From: hiro <23hiro@googlemail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [9fans] Spook/Glenda image use restrictions?
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 02df9fc2-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

So, what's *your* definition of fairness then?

On 4/15/10, erik quanstrom <quanstro@labs.coraid.com> wrote:
> On Thu Apr 15 13:35:21 EDT 2010, 23hiro@googlemail.com wrote:
>> Bothering about such nonsense is definitely unfair if you think of all
>> the starving children in the third world.
>
> logical fallacy.  if everyone dropped their livelyhood
> to help the starving children, there would be more
> starving children.
>
> - erik
>
>