From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu From: ozan s yigit Message-ID: References: <20020125022305.5C85919A8F@mail.cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] is nickle plan9 acceptable? Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 10:02:23 +0000 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 450a9336-eaca-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 > he should have called it hoc++. but most names certainly fail in describing this ... thing. [i'd probably sooner use [supressing gag reflex] perl 6...]