From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu From: ozan s yigit Message-ID: References: <4da3d9af.0203150929.1d3154d2@posting.google.com>, <200203151840.g2FIeZI02011@ducky.net> Subject: Re: macro fun [Re: [9fans] plan or side effect] Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 10:38:17 +0000 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 68a08a44-eaca-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 mike@ducky.net (Mike Haertel) writes: > This is not strictly conforming. sigh. the first example had a re-implementation, but that too is deemed illegal without "undef strcpy" just in case. oz --- furthermore, I am of the opinion that cpp must be destroyed. - Cato the Elder (Marcus Porcius Cato)