From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
From: ozan s yigit <oz@blue.cs.yorku.ca>
Message-ID: <vi4pu25oa08.fsf@blue.cs.yorku.ca>
References: <4da3d9af.0203150929.1d3154d2@posting.google.com>, <200203151840.g2FIeZI02011@ducky.net>
Subject: Re: macro fun [Re: [9fans] plan or side effect]
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 10:38:17 +0000
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 68a08a44-eaca-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

mike@ducky.net (Mike Haertel) writes:

> This is not strictly conforming.

sigh. the first example had a re-implementation, but that too is
deemed illegal without "undef strcpy" just in case.

oz
---
furthermore, I am of the opinion that cpp must be destroyed.
                      - Cato the Elder (Marcus Porcius Cato)